Roltrader / Solutions / Regulatory
Use case

Deliver to the regulatory deadline — with defensible proof.

Independent assurance that regulatory-driven programmes meet their commitments, evidenced so the gate can be defended to the regulator and the board.

The problem

A deadline forces the move — proving the commitments, defensibly, is the hard part.

50+control regimes mapped in the framework library, reconciled to what the systems do.

Regulatory programmes run to a fixed date. Meeting the date is visible; proving — independently, in a form that holds up to a regulator — that the commitments behind it are actually met is what is usually missing. Compliance is self-reported by the parties delivering the change.

We make it defensible. One independent, evidence-based view that the regulatory commitments are met — sealed in a verifiable receipt, reproducible, point-in-time.

What we assess

What independent regulatory assurance looks at.

Framework library (50+ regimes)

Control-regime reconciliation

Commitments mapped and reconciled against what the systems actually do — the gaps made visible, not assumed closed.

Decision Architecture lens

Decision adherence

Were decisions made within the mandate and authority the regime requires — completeness, authority, separation of duties, time-to-act?

Compliance & Controls lens

Control posture

Are the declared controls in place and operating — evidenced from your own metrics, not asserted?

Verifiable receipts (IVAR)

Defensible evidence

Every verdict sealed, tamper-evident and verifiable offline — a record you can hand a regulator.

Independent & honest

Point-in-time attestation

We record what the evidence shows at each reading — never implied continuous compliance.

Independent AI Audit ↗

AI-driven obligations

Where the regime binds an AI system, the AI Audit computes the regulated tests and reconciles the regimes.

Every assessment is computed from your own captured evidence, point-in-time — cited and sealed in a verifiable receipt (IVAR). We record what the evidence shows; we do not claim "live" or "continuous".

For AIWhere a regime binds an AI system, the Independent AI Audit computes and signs it→
Across the lifecycle

Four products, one independent engine.

1
Decide · PRAIS

Set up to comply?

Is the programme designed to meet the regulatory commitments on time?

2
Run · Orchestra

On mandate?

Are the commitments, owners and gates tracking to what was approved?

3
Prove · Assure

Evidenced at the gate?

Commitments evidenced at each gate; client and SI decide — defensible to the regulator.

4
Drive · Sustain

Still compliant?

After go-live — are the commitments being maintained?

Two ways to run it

Run one with a partner — or every programme with Keystone.

Run one — partner-delivered

A consultant or SI positions the suite into the programme and delivers it. Independent assurance rides alongside — the standard and the evidence are ours; delivery and sign-off are the accountable parties'.

Find a partner →

Run many — Keystone

If this is one of several programmes, Keystone rolls it into one independent board view alongside the rest of the portfolio — the cockpit and the board assurance report, enterprise-run.

Explore Keystone →
See it on your own data

Assure this programme — independently.

The demo is normally gated — request access and we'll walk you through it on representative data.