Independent IT diligence and carve-out assurance — the real state of the estate, what carves out cleanly, and what it will actually cost.
IT diligence and separation plans are frequently supplied by the parties with an interest in the deal. An independent, evidence-based read of the estate — overlap, custom code, data ownership, run cost — is what protects the value case.
We read it from the evidence. Two-state diligence computed from the actual estates — what overlaps, what separates, and the priced delta — independent of the deal parties.
Independent IT diligence — the estate as the evidence shows it, not as described.
Is the carve-out/integration plan tracking to what was approved — decisions, owners, gates evidenced?
Cutover and transition-service-exit conditions evidenced at each gate; both parties countersign.
After close — is the approved synergy or standalone value actually being realised?
A consultant or SI positions the suite into the programme and delivers it. Independent assurance rides alongside — the standard and the evidence are ours; delivery and sign-off are the accountable parties'.
Find a partner →If this is one of several programmes, Keystone rolls it into one independent board view alongside the rest of the portfolio — the cockpit and the board assurance report, enterprise-run.
Explore Keystone →The demo is normally gated — request access and we'll walk you through it on representative data.